USPTO serial 77001667
VEDAPURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HESIK, APRIL ANNE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VEDAPURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay Begler
Jay Begler Nixon PeabodySuite 900401 Ninth Street, N.W.Washington, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics; perfumery, cosmetic products, namely, non-medicated face, body and skin lotions; wellness products, namely, eye lotions, lotions for cellulite reduction, lotions for strengthening the nails; body and beauty care cosmetics; toiletries, namely, facial cleansers, facial moisturizers, face creams, face lotions, face gels, eye creams, eye gels, eye makeup remover, facial makeup remover, skin cleansing lotions, skin cleansing creams, skin cleansing gels, non-medicated anti-wrinkle creams, lotions and gels; non-medicated skin repair creams, lotions and gels; non-medicated skin blemish preparations, namely, skin concealers; facial toner, facial soaps, hand cream, body cream, body lotion, body gel, body oil, body powder, body toners, body cleansers, non-medicated bath salts, bath powder, bath oil, bath grains in the nature of bath beads, bath gels, body sprays, body washes, skin balancing lotions, creams and gels, facial skin oil controller lotion, skin firming preparations, namely, topical herbal cream for firming and enhancing breasts; eye lotions, eye gels, non-medicated skin renewal cream, facial exfoliating preparations, namely, chemical peels for skin; face masques, namely facial masks; skin refreshers, namely, skin lotion; face and body exfoliating preparations, namely, skin exfoliating lotion; body masques, face and body sunscreens, face and body self-tanning preparations, facial and body oil sprays, lip sunscreen preparations, sun tan lotions, after-sun soothing and moisturizing preparations, self-tanning preparations, personal soaps, and shaving foams, creams, lotions and gels; eau de perfume, eau de toilette, cologne and perfume; skin and grooming products for men namely, face cleansers; shaving preparations, namely, shaving foams, shaving gels, shaving and after-shave lotions, creams, balms and gels, shaving soaps; non-medicated face, body and skin care preparations and wellness products for men, namely, skin lotions; face cleansers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 27, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 16, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 16, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |