USPTO serial 77002278
LEADING THE SEAFOOD EVOLUTION.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TANNER, MICHAEL R
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LEADING THE SEAFOOD EVOLUTION.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tracy-Gene G. Durkin
TRACY-GENE G DURKIN STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX PLLC1100 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3934UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Frozen, pasteurized, processed and canned seafood, namely, crab meat, king crab meat, soft-shell crabs, fish, shrimp, lobster meat, scallops, oysters, clams and mussels; refrigerated crab meat, king crab meat, crab cakes and seafood cakes; pre-packaged frozen prepared entrees consisting primarily of seafood, namely, crab cakes, seafood cakes, salmon cakes, lobster cakes, crab claws, crab imperial, stuffed shrimp, stuffed chicken, stuffed fish; frozen prepared entrees consisting primarily of seafood; refrigerated prepared entrees consisting primarily of seafood; frozen prepared appetizers consisting primarily of seafood; refrigerated prepared appetizers consisting primarily of seafood; frozen crab pizza; frozen crab pretzel; crab stuffing; seafood stuffing; frozen prepared side dishes consisting primarily of vegetables; refrigerated prepared side dishes consisting primarily of vegetables; frozen prepared entrees consisting primarily of vegetables, beef, chicken or pork; refrigerated prepared entrees consisting primarily of vegetables, beef, chicken or pork; frozen prepared appetizers consisting primarily of cheese, vegetables, beef, chicken or pork; refrigerated prepared appetizers consisting primarily of cheese, vegetables, beef, chicken or pork; soups, chowders and bisques; seasoned peanuts; and dips, namely, crab dip and crab and artichoke dip | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Frozen prepared entrees consisting primarily of pasta or rice; refrigerated prepared entrees consisting primarily of pasta or rice; seasonings, namely, seafood seasonings and blackening spices; sauces, namely, tartar sauce and cocktail sauce | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by S.B. Phillips LLC
- Other trademarks owned by S.B. Phillips LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named LEADING THE SEAFOOD EVOLUTION.
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 23, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 22, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |