USPTO serial 77002798
CERTICOM SECURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 14, 2010
- Examiner
- BELL, MARLENE D
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CERTICOM SECURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Mississauga, CA
Mississauga, CA
Mississauga, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Colleen F. Goss
Colleen F. Goss FAY SHARPE LLP1228 Euclid AvenueThe Halle Building, 5th FloorCleveland, OH 44115Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on 44(e)) Computer software and software development tools, namely, software development tools, comprised of code based computer programs, computer software used for public key encryption, certification, access control and digital rights management, verification, privacy, confidentiality and integrity of voice and text, wired and wireless transmission of voice, web services and text of encrypted information in the field of communications and authentication of encrypted information in the field of communications; computer firmware, for use in encryption, authentication and wired and wireless transmission of voice, web services and text; computer hardware for use in the encryption, decryption, authentication and wired and wireless transmission of voice, web services and text of encrypted information in the field of communications and authentication of encrypted information in the field of communications, device to device communication, cryptography, digital signatures and public and private key generation, security functions, namely, encryption, certification, authorization, authentication, verification, data privacy, confidentiality and data integrity; integrated circuits; computer software storage media, namely, pre-recorded CD-ROMS and computer diskettes featuring computer software and documentation for providing encryption, certification, authorization, authentication, verification, data privacy, confidentiality and data integrity, computer networking, cryptography, digital signatures and private and public key generation, and security functions, namely, encryption, certification, authentication, verification, data privacy confidentiality and data integrity; radio pagers; modems; cellular telephones; telecommunications equipment, namely, radio transmitters, telephone transmitters, satellite transmitters, receivers, namely, telephone receivers, audio receivers, video receivers and data receivers, electric switches, computer networks, namely, local area networks hardware, wide area networks hardware, virtual private networks hardware, telephones, wireless computer networks, namely, networks comprised of client and server devices, namely, wireless devices in the nature of devices for wireless radio transmission, wireless network devices in the nature or wireless network extenders and their respective trust center devices, namely, integrated circuits, wireless mesh network devices, namely, computer network interface devices and their associated coordinator access points, and wireless local area network, wireless communication processors, namely, satellite processors, cellular telephony base stations, namely, cellular telephone apparatus, digital signal processors, two-way radio pagers, radio and satellite telephones, wireless handheld computers, magnetic coded and plastic smart cards, namely, electronic circuit cards with an embedded integrated circuit and stored information and data in the field of silicon semiconductors and intellectual property cores; computer terminals for use with credit cards, debit cards and plastic smart cards with an embedded integrated circuit or stored information and data, namely, magnetic coded card readers and readers of plastic smart cards with an embedded integrated circuit and stored information or data in the field of silicon semiconductors and intellectual property cores; plastic smart cards, namely, electronic circuit cards with an embedded integrated circuit and stored information and data; magnetically encoded credit cards | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | (Based on 44(e)) Credit cards without magnetic coding; debit cards without magnetic encoding; printed materials relating to educational and training programs in information technology, namely, educational and training books, guides, user manuals and marketing collateral, namely, advertising pamphlets | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | (Based on Use in Commerce) (Based on 44(e)) Information technology services, namely, cryptographic and information security consulting; providing on-line non-downloadable computer software for systems integration relating to information security for others; design of computer systems for others; security analysis services, namely, computer security consultancy | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 045 | (Based on 44(e)) Technology licensing of cryptographic methods and protocols; technology licensing of security hardware and software | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Certicom Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Certicom Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Certicom Corp.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named CERTICOM SECURE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 28, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 26, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 6, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 4, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 4, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 9, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 4, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |