USPTO serial 77003431
PAY@TABLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PAY@TABLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Lebow
Mark Lebow YOUNG & THOMPSON209 Madison StreetSuite 500Alexandria, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Interactive compact disc featuring payment transaction choice selections, apparatus for transmission of communication, namely, software based transaction terminals in order to permit direct payment by customers, computer terminals, computer software for controlling self-service terminals, encoders and electronic transcriptions units, magnetic encoded card readers, encoded smart cards containing programming for secure processing and transferring of business transactions over global computer networks and for authorization and authentication of network users and data for business financial transactions, magnetically encoded transaction cards used to ensure and secure financial and payment transactions for goods and services, portable payment systems comprised of software based transaction terminals in order to permit direct payment by customers for added convenience and security | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Credit card transaction processing services, electronic funds transfer by telecommunications, electronic payment namely, electronic processing and transmission of bill payment data, funds investment, providing electronic processing of credit card transactions and electronic payments via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Communication services, namely, electronic transmission of data and documents among users of computers, Electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals, Telecommunication services, namely, local and long distance transmission of voice, data, graphics by means of telephone, telegraphic, cable, and satellite transmissions | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer hardware development, Computer programming, Data encryption services, Developing of driver and operating system software, Encoding of magnetic cards, Information technology consultation, Maintenance of computer software, Programming of multimedia equipment, professional technical consultancy in the field of electronic payment transactions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by COMPAGNIE INDUSTRIELLE ET FINANCIERE D'INGENIERIE - INGENICO SA
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PAY@TABLE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 28, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 31, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 16, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 16, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |