Drawing for MEME

USPTO serial 77003545

MEME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHOSID, ROBIN S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward H. Rosenthal

EDWARD H ROSENTHAL FRANKFURT KURNIT KLIEN & SELZ PC488 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-5702UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software, namely, software for broadcasting and delivery of audio, video, and/or multimedia content; Real-time computer recommendation software; Computer search engine software in the field of music and entertainment; Computer software for downloading ringtones; Computer software for providing online electronic bulletin boards; Computer software for downloading photographs; Computer software for downloading games via the internet; Downloadable electronic multimedia periodical publications, namely, magazines, newsletters, and newspapers on the subject of music, videos, and the entertainment industry; Downloadable electronic publications, namely, magazines, newsletters and newspapers on the subject of music and entertainment industry; Downloadable sound and video recordings, featuring music, musical performances, and educational materials; Downloadable musical sound recordings; Pre-recorded video tape recordings featuring music and musical performancesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 11, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 11, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 7, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 15, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 25, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 6, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 5, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 5, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 5, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 23, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 2, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 1, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Sep 17, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 17, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 8, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 7, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 6, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 6, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 8, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 27, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 26, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance