USPTO serial 77003682
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $650
El Segundo, CA, US
El Segundo, CA, US
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Evan M. Kent
Evan M. Kent Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP2049 Century Park East18th FloorLos Angeles, CA 90067| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | FOOTWEAR | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 23, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 22, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 13, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |