USPTO serial 77003856
VENUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3454320Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 24, 2008
- Examiner
- RAPPAPORT, SETH
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VENUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Colorado Springs, CO
Colorado Springs, CO
Colorado Springs, CO
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | [ Contraceptive sponges; Pregnancy test kits for home use sold in adult retail stores featuring adult sexual products; Hormonal contraceptives ] | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Jan 29, 2006 |
| 010 | Adult sexual aids, namely, [ inflatable life-sized dolls used in sexual activity for home use, ] condoms, [ nipple clamps, condom rings, constriction rings for use in maintaining penile rigidity in men with erectile dysfunction, flexible devices and rubber rings to be worn on the penis, penis and vagina pumps, benwa balls, artificial vaginas and penises, enema devices, anus prolapse bands, breast prostheses, pumps, and breast shields; ] Birth control devices, namely, prophylactics, namely male and female condoms [ , diaphragms for contraception, cervical caps; Contraceptives; Lice combs; Disposable finger fitting polyethylene sleeves for hygienic insertion of a tampon; Electrical weight loss body strap for household use; Body-fat monitors for household use; Household exercise machines for therapeutic purposes; Therapeutic saunas and whirlpools for household use; Electric foot spa massagers for household use; Beauty and cosmetic sterilizing pouches for household use ] | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Jan 29, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Herculinks Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Herculinks Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Herculinks Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named VENUS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2008 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 22, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 21, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 13, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 15, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 1, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 17, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 12, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 8, 2007 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 8, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 6, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 3, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 10, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 1, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 1, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 16, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |