CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for NETREPLAY

USPTO serial 77003863

NETREPLAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAHMOUDI, MARIAM AZIZ
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NETREPLAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Bevilacqua, Esquire

Michael J. Bevilacqua, Esquire WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORRLLP60 STATE STREETBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009(Based on Intent to Use and 44(e)) Computer hardware; computer software in the field of IT security, namely, software for real-time indexing, monitoring, searching, alerting, recording, retrieving, and reporting content on computer and telecommunications networksACTIVE—
042(Based on Intent to Use) Providing temporary online use of non-downloadable software in the field of IT security, namely, software for real-time indexing, monitoring, searching, alerting, recording, retrieving, and reporting content on computer and telecommunications networks; technical support services namely, trouble shooting of computer software and hardware problems; consulting in the field of IT securityACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 30, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 30, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 29, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 27, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 27, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 30, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 30, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 11, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 4, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 29, 2009TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 29, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 29, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 28, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 31, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 29, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 20, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 20, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 20, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 30, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 30, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 30, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 14, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 6, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 17, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 2, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 2, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 2, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 2, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 20, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 17, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 16, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 28, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 27, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance