Drawing for ULTIMATE PROVING GROUND

USPTO serial 77003915

ULTIMATE PROVING GROUND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REGAN, JOHN B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ULTIMATE PROVING GROUND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer K. Craft, Michael N. Feder and Robert B. Kouchoukos

Jennifer K. Craft, Michael N. Feder and Robert B. Dickinson Wright PLLC8363 West Sunset Road, Ste. 200Las Vegas, NV 89113UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Digital video discs, digital versatile discs, CD-ROM discs, compact discs, pre-recorded video cassettes and laser video discs, all featuring sports events and sports programs; computer game programs; computer software for programming video games in the fields of sports and entertainment; motion picture films featuring sports events, mixed martial arts and profiles of athletesACTIVE—
025Clothing and wearing apparel, namely, shirts and caps; warm-up suits, sweatshirts, sweatpants, tee-shirts, tank tops, infant and toddler sleepwear, shorts, underwear, hats and visors; polo shirts; golf shirts; sports shirts; vests; pants for babies; baby booties; belts; neckties; suspenders; bandanas; beach sandals; robes; nightshirts and night gowns; pajamas and loungewear; bathing suits; beach wear; infant cloth diaper sets comprised of diapers and bibs; toddler short sets; jogging suits; rompers; boys short sets; socks; playsuits; coveralls; wristbands; union suits; woven suits; skirts; blouses; pants; slacks; jackets; referees and umpires uniforms; athletic uniforms; team uniform reproductions, namely jerseys featuring reproductions of professional athletic team logos; sweaters; parkas; turtlenecks; mittens and gloves; jerseys; bowties; headwear and scarves; ear muffs; ear bands and headbands; hosiery; rainwear, namely rain ponchos and jackets; footwear, namely shoes, boots and slippers; bath thongs; nylon shells; aprons; ski bibs; canvas footwear; knickers; wind resistant jackets; masquerade costumes; blazers; legwarmers; jeans; leotards; workout and sports apparel, namely jackets, slacks, shirtsACTIVE—
038Video-on-demand transmission servicesACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely production and distribution of television programming in the field of sports distributed over cable television, satellite television and internet webcasts; entertainment, namely live stage shows and performances and television programs, all featuring sports and mixed martial artsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 8, 2019ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 3, 2017CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2017COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 27, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 9, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 7, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 22, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
May 21, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 20, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 20, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 4, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 1, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 30, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 30, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 17, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 12, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 12, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 12, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 29, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 19, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 17, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 17, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 10, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 1, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 1, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 1, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 20, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 28, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 8, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 22, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 22, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 5, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 7, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 6, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 6, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 27, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance