Drawing for DESIGNED FOR RELIEF

USPTO serial 77004164

DESIGNED FOR RELIEF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DESIGNED FOR RELIEF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher N. Bolinger

CHRISTOPHER N BOLINGER PFIZER INC235 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5703UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed instructional and educational materials featuring information about pain and the diagnosis and treatment thereofACTIVE—
044Medical information services, namely, providing information regarding pain and the diagnosis and treatment thereof; online medical information services, namely, providing information regarding pain and the diagnosis and treatment thereof via global computer networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 8, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 8, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 2, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Feb 1, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 1, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 6, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 6, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 18, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 16, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 16, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 16, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 10, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 10, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 10, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 7, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 14, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 25, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 12, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 11, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 9, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 5, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 15, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 12, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 26, 2007CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 25, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 24, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 28, 2006AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2006PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance