USPTO serial 77004493
PEANUT LITES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3387046Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 19, 2008
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PEANUT LITES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert B.G. Horowitz
ROBERT B.G. HOROWITZ, BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP45 Rockefeller PlazaNew York, NY 10111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Battery-operated non-infrared LED light attachable to surfaces with supplied adhesive-backed hook and loop type fasteners sold as a unit intended for general consumer use | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2008 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 27, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |