Drawing for BEACON TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 77005185

BEACON TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAVACHE, LINDA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEACON TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James P. Hanrath

JAMES P. HANRATH MUCH SHELIST FREED DENENBERG ET AL191 N WACKER DRIVE, STE 1800CHICAGO, IL 60606-1615UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Data collection and processing services and inventory management and tracking of medical equipment and supplies services, namely, providing Internet accessed electronic inventory and tracking information related to barcoded home health care medical equipment and supplies to log in clientele, and consultation in relation theretoACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 21, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 29, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 29, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 15, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 14, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 13, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 27, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 27, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 27, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 16, 2009TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Sep 16, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 16, 2009OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Sep 5, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 14, 2007OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 7, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 13, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 15, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 25, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 19, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 19, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 14, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 10, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 5, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 5, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 27, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance