USPTO serial 77005276
MICHELLE BOUDREAU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHANG, KATHERINE S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MICHELLE BOUDREAU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sepehr Daghighian, Esq.
Sepehr Daghighian, Esq. LAW OFFICES OF SEPEHR DAGHIGHIAN, A.P.C.433 N CAMDEN DR FL 4BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210-4408UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Astringents for cosmetic purposes; Bath oils for cosmetic purposes; Body and beauty care cosmetics; Cleansing creams; Cocoa butter for cosmetic purposes; Concealers; Cosmetic creams; Cosmetic creams for skin care; Cosmetic milks; Cosmetic oils; Cosmetic oils for the epidermis; Cosmetic pads; Cosmetic pencils; Cosmetic preparations against sunburn; Cosmetic preparations for body care; Cosmetic preparations for eye lashes; Cosmetic preparations for skin renewal; Cosmetic preparations for the care of mouth and teeth; Cosmetic rouges; Cosmetic soaps; Cosmetic sun-protecting preparations; Cosmetics; Cosmetics namely, compacts; Cosmetics, namely lip primer; Eye make-up; Eye make-up remover; Face creams for cosmetic use; Facial make-up; Lotions for face and body care; Make up foundations; Make up removing preparations; Make-up; Make-up pencils; Make-up powder; Make-up products for the face and body; Make-up remover; Make-up removing lotions; Nail varnish for cosmetic purposes; Non-medicated lip care preparations; Non-medicated skin care preparations; Non-medicated skin creams; Nutritional oils for cosmetic purposes; Pencils for cosmetic purposes; Shampoos; Skin care products, namely, non-medicated skin serum; Skin cleansers; Skin cleansing cream; Skin cleansing lotion; Skin conditioners; Skin creams; Skin creams in liquid and in solid form; Skin lotions; Skin masks; Skin moisturizer; Skin texturizers; Skin toners | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Bracelets; Bracelets of precious metal; Clip earrings; Costume jewelry; Diamonds; Earrings; Gemstones; Jewel pendants; Jewelry; Jewelry chains; Jewelry for the head; Jewelry watches; Necklaces; Pendants; Precious gemstones; Rings being jewelry; Semi-precious gemstones; Synthetic diamonds | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Belts; Blouses; Coats for men and women; Dress shirts; Footwear for men and women; Headwear; Men and women jackets, coats, trousers, vests; Pants; Shirts; Shoes; Short-sleeved or long-sleeved t-shirts; Sport shirts; Sweaters; Tops; Women's shoes; Women's underwear; Wraps | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment in the nature of on-going television programs in the field of television variety shows and infomercials; Entertainment in the nature of visual and audio performances, and musical, variety, news and comedy shows; Entertainment in the nature of variety shows and infomercials; Entertainment namely, production of variety shows and infomercials; Entertainment services, namely, personal appearances by a celebrity; Entertainment services, namely, hosting of television variety shows and infomercials | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Boudreau, Michelle
- Other trademarks owned by Boudreau, Michelle
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named MICHELLE BOUDREAU
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 20, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 9, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 1, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 1, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 19, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 18, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 25, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 5, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2007 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 7, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 30, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 30, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 23, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |