Drawing for MANEKI NEKO

USPTO serial 77005342

MANEKI NEKO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TOOLEY, DAVID E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MANEKI NEKO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHELLE A COOKE

MICHLLE A COOKE STEPTOE & JOHNSON2121 AVENUE OF THE STARSSUITE 2800LOS ANGELES, CA 90067

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, on-going television programs in the field of children's entertainment; motion picture film productionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 24, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 24, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 24, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 23, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 21, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 21, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 28, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 25, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 10, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 10, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 22, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 18, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 18, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 17, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 13, 2009PGEXPETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED—
Apr 2, 2009PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Apr 2, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2009PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Mar 3, 2009APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Feb 9, 2009PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 25, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 2, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 2, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 1, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Aug 1, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 1, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 25, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 2, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 12, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 27, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 27, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 16, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 15, 2007CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 14, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 14, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 14, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 27, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance