Drawing for THERMOWASH

USPTO serial 77005383

THERMOWASH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RICHARDS, SUSAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THERMOWASH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roger H. Bora

ROGER H. BORA THOMPSON HINE LLPP.O. BOX 8801DAYTON, OH 45440-8801UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Automated label application equipment; machines for dispensing labels; label making machines; label overprinters, namely, machines for use in overprinting labels on cartons, labels, catch covers, plastic bags, and pouches; machines used to dispense, apply, or print and apply labels to containers, packages and bottles; and parts for the aforesaid goodsACTIVE—
016Self-adhesive paper labels; self-adhesive blank, printed and partially printed paper labels; blank, printed and partially printed paper labels; labels of paper; labels of cardboard; shipping labels; bar code labels; machines for printing labelsACTIVE—
020Blank, printed and partially printed labels on clear plastic film; labels of plastic; and cellophane labelsACTIVE—
037Consultation in the field of label application processes; application services, namely applying labels for othersACTIVE—
040Custom label printing services; printing services, namely, printing labels for othersACTIVE—
042Label and packaging design servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 31, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 22, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 21, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 24, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 16, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 16, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 26, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 21, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 21, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 30, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 30, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 5, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 5, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 12, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 12, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 12, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 8, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 8, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 8, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 4, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 22, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 30, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 10, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 26, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 25, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 25, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 25, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 12, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 12, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 10, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 1, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 2, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jun 15, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 15, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 1, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 16, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 16, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 28, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance