USPTO serial 77005890
TRANSPARENT GOODS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRANSPARENT GOODS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joan L. Long
JOAN L LONG MAYER BROWN ROWE & MAW LLPPO BOX 2828CHICAGO, IL 60690-2828UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | (Based on Intent to Use Only) application service provider, namely, hosting computer software applications for others, hosting of digital content on the internet; hosting the websites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; computer services, namely, creating indexes of information available on computer networks; providing information via the telephone and the global communication networks in the field of information technology; consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; installation, maintenance and repair of computer software; providing information at the specific request of end-users by means of telephone or global communications networks; (Based on 44(e) only) Computer programming services for others; rental of computer software and hardware for online access; data encryption services; technical project planning services related to telecommunications equipment; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable telecommunications software for providing multiple user access to the global computer network | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2009 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 9, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 20, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 7, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 10, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |