Drawing for RANGE INTERACTIVE

USPTO serial 77006142

RANGE INTERACTIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RANGE INTERACTIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Clark R. Cowley

CLARK R COWLEY WHITAKER, CHALK, SWINDLE & SAWYER LLP301 COMMERCE ST STE 3500FORT WORTH, TX 76102-4135UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Media planning and buying, namely providing advice concerning advertising on the Internet, and procuring advertising placements on the InternetACTIVE—
042XML feed set up optimization and management, namely computer and website programming for others; pay for placement website search term analysis, evaluation, monitoring, managing, planning and implementation, namely data mining and technical consultation in the field of selecting search terms; website and rich media design and implementation, namely designing websites for advertising purposes; website usability analysis, namely consulting in the field of website design; technical analysis, evaluation and management of search marketing program data, namely website hit data, for the purpose of search engine optimizationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 17, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 17, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 16, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 24, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 4, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 21, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 20, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 14, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 14, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 23, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 23, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 23, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 7, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 5, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance