USPTO serial 77006500
BENEDETTO'S AUTHENTIC ITALIAN PIZZA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 1, 2014
- Examiner
- BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with BENEDETTO'S AUTHENTIC ITALIAN PIZZA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ORIGINAL CRISPY PIZZA CRUST CO. OF BOSTON, INC.
LINCOLN, RI
Other trademarks owned by ORIGINAL CRISPY PIZZA CRUST CO. OF BOSTON, INC.
ORIGINAL CRISPY PIZZA CRUST CO. OF BOSTON, INC.
LINCOLN, RI
Other trademarks owned by ORIGINAL CRISPY PIZZA CRUST CO. OF BOSTON, INC.
ORIGINAL CRISPY PIZZA CRUST CO. OF BOSTON, INC.
LINCOLN, RI
Other trademarks owned by ORIGINAL CRISPY PIZZA CRUST CO. OF BOSTON, INC.
Original Crispy Pizza Crust Co. of Boston, Inc.
Lincoln, RI
Other trademarks owned by Original Crispy Pizza Crust Co. of Boston, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sarah Anne Keefe
Sarah Anne Keefe Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP470 Atlantic Avenue, Suite 600BOSTON, MA 02210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Pizza; Pizza crust; Pizza dough; Pizza sauce | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ORIGINAL CRISPY PIZZA CRUST CO. OF BOSTON, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ORIGINAL CRISPY PIZZA CRUST CO. OF BOSTON, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ORIGINAL CRISPY PIZZA CRUST CO. OF BOSTON, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Original Crispy Pizza Crust Co. of Boston, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named BENEDETTO'S AUTHENTIC ITALIAN PIZZA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2024 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2024 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 25, 2024 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 25, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 28, 2023 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 11, 2020 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2020 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Sep 9, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 23, 2020 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 29, 2014 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2014 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2014 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 13, 2014 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 4, 2014 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 27, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 6, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 21, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 20, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 28, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 29, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 1, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 29, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 29, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2007 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |