USPTO serial 77006581
IRONFLOWER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RINGLE, JAMES W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IRONFLOWER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Stumer
MARK STUMER MARK STUMER & ASSOCIATES PC200 PARK AVE S STE 1511NEW YORK, NY 10003-1522UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | A complete method to fitness and well being | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2008 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 15, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |