USPTO serial 77006675
CARING CUISINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HETZEL, DANNEAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CARING CUISINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Indianapolis, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Holiday W. Banta
HOLIDAY W BANTA WOODARD, EMHARDT, MORIARTY, MCNETT & HEN111 MONUMENT CIR STE 3700INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-5137UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Dietary and nutritionally fortified and vitamin and mineral enriched complete food products and supplements adapted for medical use, namely, bread, biscuit, roll, bun, French toast, muffin, cake, cookie, cornbread, stuffing, tortilla, pizza dough, pancake, waffle, pastry, and dessert mixes; (Based on Intent to Use) Dietary and nutritionally fortified food products and supplements adapted for medical use; nutritional additives adapted for medical purposes for use in foods, namely, beverages, soups, cereal products, sauces, desserts, casseroles, entrees, and snacks | ACTIVE | Jun 3, 2003 |
| 030 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Dietary and nutritionally fortified and vitamin and mineral enriched complete food products and supplements, namely, bread, biscuit, roll, bun, French toast, muffin, cake, cookie, cornbread, stuffing, tortilla, pizza dough, pancake, waffle, pastry, and dessert mixes; (Based on Intent to Use) Dietary and nutritionally fortified food products and supplements; nutritional additives for use in foods, namely, beverages, soups, cereal products, sauces, desserts, casseroles, entrees, and snacks | ACTIVE | Jun 3, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 27, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 11, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |