Drawing for TRUE LOYALTY

USPTO serial 77006754

TRUE LOYALTY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BEN, LINDSEY HEATHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRUE LOYALTY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Colm J. Dobbyn

COLM J DOBBYN MASTERCARD INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATEDLAW DEPT2000 PURCHASE STPURCHASE, NY 10577-2509

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036FINANCIAL SERVICES, namely, BANKING AND CREDIT CARD SERVICES; PROVIDING CREDIT CARD, DEBIT CARD, CHARGE CARD AND STORED VALUE PREPAID CARD SERVICES; PROVIDING ELECTRONIC FUNDS AND CURRENCY TRANSFER SERVICES, ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS SERVICES RELATING TO CREDIT AND DEBIT CARDS; CHECK VERIFICATION SERVICES; FINANCIAL ADVISORY SERVICES RELATING TO ALL THE AFORESAID SERVICESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 19, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 19, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 15, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 22, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 2, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 18, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 17, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 15, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 15, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 14, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 13, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 31, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 31, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 31, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 31, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 30, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 30, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 30, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 5, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 7, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 2, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance