USPTO serial 77006996
F BY FORTUNA VALENTINO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with F BY FORTUNA VALENTINO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vickhams Cay, Tortola, VG
Vickhams Cay, Tortola, VG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard Bader
HOWARD BADER BALLON STOLL BADER & NADLER729 SEVENTH AVENUE17TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10019Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Bags, namely, duffel bags, all-purpose carrying bags, gym bags; handbags; pocketbooks, pouches, namely, drawstring pouches, leather pouches, tool pouches sold empty; cases, namely, attaché cases, briefcases; haversacks; luggage trunks; pocket wallets; purses; document cases; suitcases; card cases, namely, business card cases, credit card cases, calling card cases; key holders, namely, leather key cases; sling bags, namely, tote bags, backpacks, rucksacks; bags on wheels, namely, suitcases, garment bags; traveling bags; sports bags; leather and imitation leather bags; textile shopping bags | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 2013 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 26, 2013 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 26, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 21, 2013 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 7, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |