Drawing for DASHWIRE

USPTO serial 77007086

DASHWIRE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DASHWIRE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Aaron Hendelman

AARON HENDELMAN WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI650 PAGE MILL RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1050UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software to enable the transmission of data and information to mobile communications devices; mobile computing and operating platforms for the collection and management of data and information; computer software for creation of mobile communications device applications and interfaces; computer application software for mobile communications devices; computer software for access to electronic and optical communications networks for the transfer and dissemination of a wide range of information; computer software for operating mobile communications devices and telecommunications systems; computer software for the activation and operation of wireless telecommunications services; computer software development toolsACTIVE—
038electronic mail services; voice messaging servicesACTIVE—
042providing non-downloadable computer software to enable the transmission of data and information to mobile communications devices; providing non-downloadable mobile computing and operating platforms for the collection and management of data and information; providing non-downloadable computer software for creation of mobile communications device applications and interfaces; providing non-downloadable computer application software for mobile communications devices; providing non-downloadable computer software for access to electronic and optical communications networks for the transfer and dissemination of a wide range of information; providing non-downloadable computer software for operating mobile communications devices and telecommunications systems; providing non-downloadable computer software for the activation and operation of wireless telecommunications services; data encryption services; hosting of digital content on electronic and optical communications networks; hosting the websites of others on electronic and optical communications networks; computer services, namely, creating indexes of information available on electronic and optical communications networks; providing information at the specific request of end-users by means of telephone or electronic and optical communications networks; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable telecommunications software for providing multiple user access to electronic and optical communications networks; nondownloadable computer e-commerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions and generate sales and purchases of digital content via electronic, mobile and optical communications networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 8, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 8, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 7, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 14, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 25, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 10, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 10, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 15, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 14, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 14, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 14, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 29, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 18, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 28, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Mar 17, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 17, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 26, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 6, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 14, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Mar 13, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 13, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 15, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 13, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 29, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance