USPTO serial 77007142
PMI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PMI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James W. Inskeep
James W. Inskeep Inskeep Intellectual Property Group, Inc.2281 W 190th St Ste 200Torrance, CA 90504UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Distributorships in the field of industrial machinery, namely bin sorters, board turners, chip blankers, chippers, chip screens, cutterheads, feed tables, finger joiners, grade stampers, grinders, hogs, knives, lumber accelerators, live roll bridges, lumber wrap dispensers, lug loaders, metal detectors, moisture detectors, moulders and parts therefor, planers and parts therefor, scanners, stackers, saws, tilt hoists and trimmers; Distributorships in the field of front and rear end attachments for industrial vehicles, namely groomers graters and shovels | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Custom manufacture of industrial machinery for planer mills and saw mills, namely bin sorters, board turners, chip blankers, chippers, chip screens, cutterheads, feed tables, finger joiners, grade stampers, grinders, hogs, knives, lumber accelerators, live roll bridges, lumber wrap dispensers, lug loaders, metal detectors, moisture detectors, moulders and parts therefor, planers and parts therefor, scanners, stackers, saws, tilt hoists and trimmers | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Training services in the use of industrial machinery for planer mills and saw mills | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design of industrial machinery for planer mills and saw mills, namely bin sorters, board turners, chip blankers, chippers, chip screens, cutterheads, feed tables, finger joiners, grade stampers, grinders, hogs, knives, lumber accelerators, live roll bridges, lumber wrap dispensers, lug loaders, metal detectors, moisture detectors, moulders and parts therefor, planers and parts therefor, scanners, stackers, saws, tilt hoists and trimmers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Progressive Mill Supplies Holdings Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PMI
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 30, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 30, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 14, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |