Drawing for INCREDICLIPS

USPTO serial 77007146

INCREDICLIPS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALT, JILL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INCREDICLIPS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

R. Joseph Trojan

R. Joseph Trojan TROJAN LAW OFFICES9250 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 325BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212-3376UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Eyewear, namely glasses, sunglasses, eyeglass frames, sunglass frames, eyeglass lenses, sunglass lenses, lenses attachable to eyeglasses by magnets, lenses attachable to sunglasses by magnets, frames attachable to eyeglasses by magnets, frames attachable to sunglasses by magnetsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 20, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 20, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 20, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 21, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 21, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 21, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 26, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 3, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 14, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 16, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 2, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 2, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 28, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 29, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance