Drawing for DALLAS DHU

USPTO serial 77007439

DALLAS DHU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DALLAS DHU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033WhiskeyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 12, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 12, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 14, 2009GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2009GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 8, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 8, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 7, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 7, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 7, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 24, 2009ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2009GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2009GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Mar 2, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 29, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 28, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 28, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 28, 2008ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2008GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2008GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2008CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Feb 26, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 25, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 25, 2008ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2008GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 25, 2008GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 25, 2008CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 25, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 24, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 2, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 2, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 2, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 4, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 25, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 25, 2006COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 13, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 2, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance