USPTO serial 77007727
ALTO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEAM, ALEX S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALTO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARVIN PETRY
MARVIN PETRY STITES & HARBISON PLLC1199 NORTH FAIRFAX STREETSUITE 900ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-1437Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | METAL MODULAR FORMS FOR CASTING CONCRETE; METAL STRUCTURAL SHORING FOR THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY, NAMELY, BEAMS, POSTS, CHORDS, DROP HEADS, SCREWJACKS, CLAMPS, TIE RODS, WEDGES, GRIPPING PLATES AND PANELS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2010 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 4, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |