Drawing for MICHAELS HOME COLLECTION

USPTO serial 77007875

MICHAELS HOME COLLECTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TIERNEY, MARGERY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MICHAELS HOME COLLECTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carl C. Butzer

CARL C BUTZER JACKSON WALKER LLP901 MAIN ST STE 6000DALLAS, TX 75202-3797UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Cast stone containers for household and garden use; Containers for household or kitchen use not of precious metal; Plastic storage containers for domestic use; Dispensers for liquid soap; Household utensils, namely, cake cutters, cookie cutters, cookie scoop, cookie presses, cake stands, cake covers, cake and cookie molds, tips on icing bags, pastry roller, cake leveler, spatulas, pastry servers, cake servers, icing bags, knives, pans, pots, decorating bags; Vases and bowls; Decorative storage items, namely, containers made of wicker, fabric and non precious metalACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 12, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 5, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 21, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 3, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 17, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 17, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 2, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 2, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 15, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 15, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 15, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 22, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 2, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 18, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 18, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 28, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 27, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 27, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 4, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 4, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 4, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 16, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 16, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 17, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 2, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance