USPTO serial 77008274
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christine S. Cox
Christine S. Cox Culhane Meadows PLLC3340 Peachtree Road, Suite 1800Atlanta, GA 30326UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Building construction and repair; Building maintenance and repair; Construction consultancy; Construction consultation; Construction management; Construction of temporary structures; Construction planning; Construction supervision; Consultation in building construction supervision; Rental of construction and building equipment; Rental of portable walls, flooring, windows, doors and paneling; Residential and building construction consulting; Residential and commercial building construction | EXPIRED | Jan 9, 2007 |
| 043 | Arranging temporary housing accommodations; Emergency shelter services, namely, providing temporary housing; Leasing of metal and non-metal buildings for temporary use purposes; Providing banquet and social function facilities for special occasions; Providing campground facilities; Providing temporary accommodation; Providing temporary housing accommodations; Providing temporary trailer park facilities; Rental of portable buildings; Rental of portable modular buildings; Rental of tents | EXPIRED | Jan 9, 2007 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 31, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2013 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2013 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 20, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 25, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 14, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |