USPTO serial 77008510
MYSINGLEFRIEND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRIDGETT G
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MYSINGLEFRIEND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Gloucestershire, GB
Medway City Estate, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Danielle I. Mattessich
Danielle I. Mattessich MERCHANT & GOULD P.C.PO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Books, magazines, newsletters, brochures, pamphlets in the field of social introduction services, dating services, dating agency services and issues of interest to users of dating agency services; greeting cards; postcards; printed invitations | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Computer communications services; electronic on-line services for the receipt and delivery of messages, documents, images and other data by electronic transmission; electronic mail services; providing multiple-users access to a global computer information network; electronic messaging services; providing access via a global computer network to electronic bulletin boards; transmission of information in the audio, visual and multi-media fields; transmission of information via national and international networks; internet and radio broadcastings services; TV broadcasting services; cable and satellite TV broadcasting services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, creating an online community for registered users to display personal information, showcase their skills, get feedback from their peers, engage in social networking and participate in competitions; design and development of web sites; writing and compiling the content of websites | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | DATING AGENCY SERVICES; DATING SERVICES; MATCH-MAKING SERVICES; SOCIAL ESCORTING SERVICES; ARRANGING PERSONAL INTRODUCTIONS; CURRICULUM VITAE AND PERSONALITY PROFILE PREPARATION SERVICES AS PART OF THE DATING SERVICES; CONSULTANCY AND ADVISORY SERVICES RELATING TO THE FOREGOING; PROVIDING AND DISTRIBUTING INFORMATION VIA THE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK OR INTERNET IN RELATION TO DATING; PROVIDING ALL AFORESAID SERVICES VIA THE INTERNET WITH THE USE OF COMPUTERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by My Single Friend Limited
- Other trademarks owned by My Single Friend Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named MYSINGLEFRIEND
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2011 | PCBM | PETITION TO DIRECTOR WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| May 2, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 31, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 2, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 16, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 11, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 3, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 30, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 27, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 1, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 9, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 19, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |