USPTO serial 77008603
SOAP SILLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JUN, WON KYUNG WENDY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SOAP SILLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Stevenson Ranch, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | Skin care preparations, soaps, body lotions, body creams, body butters, body exfoliating scrubs, non-medicated bath bombs containing fragrances and oils, lip balms, body and bath oils, bath tablets, bath salts, bath powders and bath oils, skin soaps and other skin cleansers, bubble bath in solid form, essential oils or fragrances in solid, liquid or mist form for use in scenting rooms, Exfoliant creams, Face and body creams, Face and body lotions, Face creams, Facial cleansers, Facial masks, Facial scrubs, Lip balm, Make-up remover, Night cream, Non-medicated foot cream,Skin masks, Skin moisturizer, Skin toners, Beauty serums | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 26, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 24, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |