USPTO serial 77008840
BONDI BURGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENJAMIN, SARA NICOLE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BONDI BURGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sydney New South Wales, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Epstein
JEFFREY H EPSTEIN COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN PC1133 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6799UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | BEEF BURGERS, NAMELY, HAMBURGER PATTIES, NOT MADE OF WAGYU BEEF; POULTRY, NAMELY, UNCOOKED, MARINATED, PREPARED FOR COOKING POULTRY AND POULTRY, NAMELY, COOKED POULTRY SOLD IN APPLICANT'S FAST FOOD RESTAURANTS; POULTRY, NAMELY, PREPARED CHICKEN, CHICKEN BURGER PATTIES, CHICKEN SCHNITZEL, ALL SOLD IN APPLICANT'S FAST FOOD RESTAURANTS AND CHICKEN SCHNITZEL BURGER PATTIES, CHILI CHICKEN; POULTRY AND VEGETABLES, NAMELY, PREPACKAGED DINNERS CONSISTING OF CHICKEN WITH POTATOES, NAMELY, FRENCH-FRIED POTATOES AND CHICKEN, VEGETABLES AND SALADS, SOLD IN APPLICANT'S FAST FOOD RESTAURANTS; SAUSAGES SOLD IN APPLICANT'S FAST FOOD RESTAURANTS; FRUIT SALADS SOLD IN APPLICANT'S FAST FOOD RESTAURANTS; VEGETABLE SALADS SOLD IN APPLICANT'S FAST FOOD RESTAURANTS; JELLIES, NAMELY, MEAT JELLIES AND FLAVORED MEAT JELLIES SOLD IN APPLICANT'S FAST FOOD RESTAURANTS; COOKED DRIED AND PRESERVED VEGETABLES PREPARED WITH SAUCES AND DRESSINGS SOLD IN APPLICANT'S FAST FOOD RESTAURANTS; CONDIMENTS, NAMELY, PEPPER OIL AND MARINATED AND PROCESSED ONIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | HAMBURGER SANDWICHES, NOT MADE OF WAGYU BEEF, CHICKEN SANDWICHES AND CHICKEN SCHNITZEL SANDWICHES, ALL SOLD IN APPLICANT'S FAST FOOD RESTAURANTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 29, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 31, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |