USPTO serial 77008890
BOSSY BOOTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COOPER, CHRISTINE H
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BOSSY BOOTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Redondo Beach, CA
Palos verdes Estates, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith D. Nowak
KEITH D. NOWAK CARTER LEDYARD & MILBURN LLP2 WALL STNEW YORK, NY 10005-2001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Children's story books, series of fiction books featuring stories and activities for children; magazines featuring children's stories and activities; children's activity books; coloring books; trading cards featuring characters and fictional stories; bookmarks; notebooks; stationery; greeting cards; postcards; printed invitations; memo pads; writing paper; erasers; pencils; pens; crayons; pen and pencil cases; cases for school supplies; rubber stamps and rubber stamp sets with ink containing stamps and stamp pads; stickers; appliqués in the form of decals; gift wrapping paper; address books; photograph albums; posters; pencil sharpeners; paper party hats, paper party decorations; paper table cloths; paper napkins, paper party bags | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts, tops, blouses, t-shirts, tank tops, sweatshirts, vests, jackets, hooded jackets, dresses, jumpers, coats, pants skirts, shorts, sweatpants, sleepwear, belts, socks, hosiery, underwear, and bathing suits; infantwear; beachwear; Halloween costumes; headwear, namely, hats and caps; scarves; gloves; mittens; footwear; sandals; sneakers; shoes; slippers; boots; shorts | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Toys and playthings, namely, plush toys, soft sculpture toys, action figures and accessories therefor, dolls and accessories therefor, toy figures and accessories therefor, play figures and accessories therefor, modeled plastic toy figurines, talking toys, playsets, namely, doll furniture, doll cases, jigsaw puzzles, balloons, children's play cosmetics, board games, card games, paper dolls, playsets and cases that are specially adapted or fitted for plush toys, soft sculpture toys, action figures and accessories therefor, dolls and accessories therefor, toy figures and accessories therefor, play figures and accessories therefor, modeled plastic toy figurines, talking toys, playsets, namely, doll furniture, doll cases, jigsaw puzzles, balloons, children's play cosmetics, board games, card games, paper dolls | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hastings, Suanne Margaret
- Other trademarks owned by Hastings, Suanne Margaret
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named BOSSY BOOTS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 14, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 9, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 15, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 19, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 30, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 17, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 15, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |