Drawing for PROVIDER OF QUALIFIED TRADESMEN

USPTO serial 77009011

PROVIDER OF QUALIFIED TRADESMEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JORDAN, AMEETA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROVIDER OF QUALIFIED TRADESMEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gail M. Hashimoto

GAIL M HASHIMOTO HOPKINS & CARLEYTHE LETITIA BLDG70 S 1ST STSAN JOSE, CA 95113

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Employment agencies; employment hiring, recruiting, placement, staffing and career networking services; temporary employment agenciesACTIVEApr 1, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 18, 2008MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jun 18, 2008ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 18, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 7, 2008GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 2008GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 19, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 4, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 4, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 4, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 3, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 3, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 3, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 3, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 24, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 24, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 28, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 3, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance