Drawing for NATURAEXTRACTA FIERY FLAVOR, UNIQUE TASTE

USPTO serial 77009057

NATURAEXTRACTA FIERY FLAVOR, UNIQUE TASTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NATURAEXTRACTA FIERY FLAVOR, UNIQUE TASTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John M. Murphy

JOHN M. MURPHY Arochi, Marroquín & Lindner, S.C.5802 Bob Bullock (Loop 20)Building C1-56YILaredo, TX 78041

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Essential oils for use in manufacturing of foods, beverages, cosmetics, toiletries, pharmaceuticals and household cleaning products; Essential oils for use in the manufacture of scented products.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 24, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 24, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 22, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 17, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 17, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 21, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 4, 2010TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jan 4, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 4, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 25, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 12, 2009DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 10, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 6, 2009DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2009ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 23, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 23, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 28, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 28, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 28, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 26, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 18, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 18, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 18, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 22, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 25, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 25, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 2, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 12, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 30, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 29, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 19, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 6, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 5, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 5, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 25, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 23, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 4, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Oct 3, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance