Drawing for CHS

USPTO serial 77009062

CHS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LITZAU, MICHAEL
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GEORGE W. LEWIS

GEORGE W LEWIS JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC400 7TH ST NW STE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2218UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Management and administration of occupational health programs for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 8, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 23, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 23, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 24, 2008GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2008GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 7, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 19, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 19, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 17, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 17, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 17, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 17, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 16, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 16, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 23, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 9, 2007AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 6, 2006PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Oct 3, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance