USPTO serial 77009065
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Universal City, CA
Universal City, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DeAnne Ozaki
DEANNE OZAKI UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP10 UNIVERSAL CITY PLZ STE 350, 3RD FLUNIVERSAL CITY, CA 91608UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Broadcast of cable television programs; broadcasting programs via a global computer network; cable radio broadcasting and transmission; cable, network and satellite television broadcasting and transmission services; transmitting streamed sound and audio-visual recordings via the Internet; streaming of audio and video material on the Internet; digital and electronic transmission of voice, data, sound, images, audio, video, signals, messages and information; video-on-demand transmission services; providing on-line chat rooms and forums and electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among users concerning music and musical entertainment; providing wireless transmission of uploadable and downloadable ring tones, voice, music, mp3s, graphics, games, images, videos, information and news via a global computer network to wireless mobile communication devices; wireless digital messaging services featuring the sending and receiving of voice and text messages between wireless communication devices; wireless communication services, namely transmission of information relating to public opinion voting and polling through wireless communication devices; and providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2007 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 4, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 23, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 22, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |