USPTO serial 77009468
MARKY RAMONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MARKY RAMONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amy F. Divino
Amy F. Divino Cozen O'Connor250 Park AvenueSuite 1000New York, NY 10177Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Pre-recorded DVDs featuring music, live musical performances, documentaries | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 10, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 29, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 30, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 16, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 26, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |