Drawing for SHELF SHARK

USPTO serial 77009519

SHELF SHARK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MADDEN, ANNE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHELF SHARK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

April Wurster

April Wurster Baker & McKenzie LLP12544 High Bluff Drive, Third FloorSan Diego, CA 92130UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Shelf organizersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 24, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2009UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED—
Mar 27, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 26, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 26, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 26, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 14, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 14, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 26, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 26, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 31, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 31, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 1, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 16, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 2, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 3, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance