Drawing for ABLE EAR

USPTO serial 77009558

ABLE EAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PARK, JENNY K
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ABLE EAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Glenn H. Lenzen

Glenn H. Lenzen Polsinelli Shughart PC700 West 47th Street, Suite 1000Kansas City, MO 64112UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Electric hearing aids; Electrical hearing aids; Electrically operated hearing aids; Hearing aids; Hearing aids for the deaf; Medical hearing instruments and parts of such devices; Wireless transmitters and receivers for use with hearing aidsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 14, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 14, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 12, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 3, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 3, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 6, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 5, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 10, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 10, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 4, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 4, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 10, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 10, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 9, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 9, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 9, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 20, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 20, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 8, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 8, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 12, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 20, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 31, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 18, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 18, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 18, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 15, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 15, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 27, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 20, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 24, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 24, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 20, 2007GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 20, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 16, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 25, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 25, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance