USPTO serial 77010049
LAKE SHORE LEAP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAWE III, WILLIAM H
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LAKE SHORE LEAP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bryan P. Sugar
Bryan P. Sugar Ungaretti & Harris LLP70 West Madison StreetSuite 3500, Attn: IP TM DocketChicago, IL 60602-4224Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Motion picture films about music, theatrical, comedic and dramatic entertainment, celebrity, dramatic and cultural events; audio and visual recordings, namely, audio and video cassette tapes, video tapes, compact discs, phonograph records, pre-recorded audio and video tapes, digital versatile discs and audio and video cassettes featuring music, musical performances, and theatrical, comedic and dramatic entertainment; photographic cameras; CD players and recorders; audio cassette players and recorders; televisions and video monitors; video cassette recorders and players; radios; audio speakers; headphones; stereo tuners; stereo receivers; amplifiers; graphic equalizers; telephones; computer programs for the purpose of creating, composing, playing and performing music, featuring music and musical performances and theatrical, comedic and dramatic entertainment; eyewear, namely, eyeglasses and contact lenses, eyeglass cases and eyeglass parts, namely, eyeglass lenses, eyeglass chains and cords, eyeglass frames; prepaid magnetically encoded telephone calling cards, computer game equipment containing memory devices, namely, discs | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, fur muffs, mufflers, stoles, fur stoles, dresses, dressing gowns, evening gowns, blazers, suits, pantsuits, tuxedos, cummerbunds, blouses, blousons, skirts, shirts, knit shirts, sweat bands, neckwear, neck bands, wrist bands, bathing caps, bathing suits, bathing trunks, bathrobes, beach cover-ups, beach wear, sarongs, bikinis, body shapers, body suits, neck ties, bow ties, panties, slips, tights, veils, pantyhose, knee highs, leggings, hosiery, socks, sweat socks, night shirts, night gowns, pajamas, lingerie, negligees, teddies, boxer shorts, underpants, undershirts, t-shirts, bras, brassieres, briefs, camisoles, corsets, corselets, girdles, Halloween and masquerade costumes, coveralls, cuffs, sashes, scarves, shawls, ski wear, halter tops, maillots, frocks, gabardines, gaiters, gloves, mittens, golf shirts, suspenders, bandanas, aprons, jeans, jogging suits, jumpers, pants, slacks, shorts, tank tops, tennis wear, knickers, leotards, leg warmers, parkas, play suits, polo shirts, sweaters, cardigans, capes, cloth, fur and leather jackets, fur, leather, rain, sport, suit, top and over coats, waistcoats, wind resistant jackets, rain coats, athletic uniforms, jerseys, belts for clothing, footwear, namely, shoes, boots, athletic shoes; and headwear, namely, hats, caps and visors | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services in the nature of live musical performances; audio recording and production; music publishing services, music composition and transcription for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Steve Dahl and Co., Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Steve Dahl and Co., Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named LAKE SHORE LEAP
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 29, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 18, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 29, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 29, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 26, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 3, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 14, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 9, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 14, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 21, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 14, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 14, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |