USPTO serial 77010066
SANO FOODS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3614283Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 5, 2009
- Examiner
- DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SANO FOODS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Meal replacement bars; Meal replacement drinks; Meal replacement powders; Dietary and nutritional supplements; Dietary food supplements; Dietary supplemental drinks; Soy protein for use as a nutritional ingredient in various powdered and ready-to-drink beverages | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 11, 2006 |
| 029 | Prepared or packaged entrees consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; Soups; Stews; Sandwich spread, namely, Fruit-based spreads; Vegetable salads; Dips; Egg substitute; Non-dairy creamer; Seafood; Poultry; Processed edible seeds; Nut meats; Processed nuts; Fruit-based filling for cakes and pies; Processed vegetables; Frozen vegetables; Meat; Edible oil; Formed textured vegetable protein to be used as an extender or meat substitute; Protein for use as a food additive; Protein based, nutrient-dense snack bars; Processed lamb; Pork; Beef; Milk; Dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 11, 2006 |
| 030 | Prepared or packaged entrees consisting primarily of pasta or rice; Relish; Sauces; Sauce mixes; Tomato sauce; Pizza; Cookies; Crackers; Mixes for bakery goods; coffee; teas; Bakery desserts; Breakfast cereals; Frozen breads; Bakery goods; Cakes; Pies; Processed grains; Flour; Food starch; Corn starch; Pasta; Rice; Dry seasoning mixes for stews, sloppy joes, spaghetti sauces; Natural sweetener | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 11, 2006 |
| 035 | Advertising and advertisement services; Mail sorting, handling and receiving; Product merchandising; General business merchandising services, namely, marketing; Distributorships in the field of food; On-line retail store services featuring food and drinks; Mail order catalog services featuring food and drinks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 11, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sullivan, Donna Louise
- Other trademarks owned by Sullivan, Donna Louise
- Other trademarks owned by Sullivan, Donna Louise
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named SANO FOODS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2020 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Apr 20, 2020 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 10, 2020 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | NCS8 | NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SEC. 8 EMAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Aug 4, 2019 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 4, 2019 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2019 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| May 23, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 23, 2015 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2015 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Apr 22, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 17, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2007 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 16, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |