USPTO serial 77010095
DAVID WOLFE'S SUNFOOD NUTRITION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DAVID WOLFE'S SUNFOOD NUTRITION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laurel L. Boone
Laurel L. Boone DosterUllom16090 Swingley Ridge RoadSuite 620Chesterfield, MO 63017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | non-medicated skin care preparations, hair care preparations | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | nutritional or food supplements for humans, namely: mineral supplements, vitamin supplements, anti-oxidants, enzymes | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | electric food blenders, electric juice extractors, juice extractors, juice machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | audio and video tapes featuring information in the areas of health, nutrition, peak performance,spiritual health, well-being, parenting, child health | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | books in the field of health, nutrition, peak performance,spiritual health, well-being, parenting, child health | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | proteins being foodstuffs for human consumption, processed edible seaweed, processed bee pollen for food purposes, processed fruits, processed vegetables, processed edible seeds, processed mushrooms, processed olives, processed fats and oils, processed root vegetables, cocoa butter for food purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | tea, spices, sugar substitutes, cocoa, food flavorings not being essential oils | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | raw nuts, raw fruits, raw vegetables, raw olives, raw beans, rice bran | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nature's First Law, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named DAVID WOLFE'S SUNFOOD NUTRITION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 15, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 18, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 7, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |