Drawing for SCHENCKACCURATE

USPTO serial 77010367

SCHENCKACCURATE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KELLY, JOHN M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 117

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCHENCKACCURATE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roxana Wizorek

ROXANA WIZOREK GODFREY & KAHN SC780 N WATER STMILWAUKEE, WI 53202-3512UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007machines, namely, bulk bag discharging for use in emptying dry solids materials stored in bulk bags for dispensing into feeders, mixers or screw conveyors in process industries, mechanized dry chemical feeders for use in metering and/or weighing solid materials into manufacturing process applications, mechanized bulk conveyor feeders for use in metering and/or weighing solid materials into a manufacturing process application, mechanized louvered vibratory feeders for metering and/or weighing and spreading solid materials into a manufacturing process application, and controls for the operation of the foregoingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 10, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 23, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 17, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 15, 2009MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
May 15, 2009ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 14, 2009EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 5, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 6, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 5, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 5, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 3, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 3, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 3, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 6, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 5, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 5, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 4, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 5, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Oct 4, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance