USPTO serial 77010429
TITANIUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHRODY, ALLISON PAIGE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TITANIUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Russell W. Warnock
RUSSELL W WARNOCK BSH HOME APPLIANCES CORPORATION100 BOSCH BLVDNEW BERN, NC 28562-6924UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Household and kitchen machines and equipment, namely, electric kitchen machines and equipment, namely, dishwashers; parts of all aforementioned goods in this class | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Household and kitchen machines and equipment, namely, heating, steam producing, and cooking devices, namely, cooking, baking, frying, grilling, toasting, thawing, and hot-keeping apparatus, namely, microwave appliances, namely, microwave ovens; cooling devices, namely, refrigerators, freezers, combination refrigerator-freezers, deep freezers, ice making machines, ice-cream machines; parts of all aforementioned goods in this class | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2010 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 13, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 14, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 15, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 8, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |