USPTO serial 77010473
MEXSNAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEXSNAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter V Schroeder
PETER V SCHROEDER CRUTSINGER & BOOTH LLC1601 ELM STSTE 1950DALLAS, TX 75201-4744Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2008 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2008 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 22, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 22, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 28, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |