USPTO serial 77010518
C COUNTERFIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with C COUNTERFIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PAUL H. KOCHANSKI
PAUL H. KOCHANSKI LERNER DAVID LITTENBERG KRUMHOLZ ET AL600 SOUTH AVENUE WESTWESTFIELD, NJ 07090UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER PRINTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN THE GENERATION OF PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION SECURITY CODES; PRODUCT RECOGNITION APPARATUS, NAMELY, RADIO FREQUENCY TAG READERS, OPTICAL CHARACTER RECOGNITION SCANNERS AND BAR CODE SCANNERS; BAR CODE PRINTERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR CONTROLLING PACKAGING CODING EQUIPMENT, PACKAGING AND LABELING MACHINES, RADIO FREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION EQUIPMENT AND AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION EQUIPMENT; DATABASE MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE FOR USE IN PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION, TRACKING AND TRACING | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | DATABASE MANAGEMENT AND SECURED DATABASE MANAGEMENT SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATION ACCESS SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING ACCESS TO DATABASES; ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA TO DATABASES VIA TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | WRITING, INSTALLING AND MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER PRINTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN THE GENERATION OF PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION CODES; WRITING, INSTALLING AND MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR CONTROLLING LABELING PRINTERS, PRODUCT RECOGNITION APPARATUS, BAR CODE PRINTERS, PRODUCTION LINE EQUIPMENT, PACKAGING AND LABELING MACHINES, RADIO FREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION EQUIPMENT AND AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION EQUIPMENT RESEARCH, CONSULTANCY AND ADVISORY SERVICES RELATING TO THE USE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR CONTROLLING PACKAGING CODING EQUIPMENT, LABELING PRINTERS, PRODUCT RECOGNITION APPARATUS, BAR CODE PRINTERS, PRODUCTION LINE EQUIPMENT, PACKAGING AND LABELING MACHINES, RADIO FREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION EQUIPMENT AND AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION EQUIPMENT; ONLINE VERIFICATION SERVICES FOR VERIFICATION OF BAR CODES AND CODES FOR PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Claricom Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named C COUNTERFIGHT
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 18, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 5, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 9, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |