USPTO serial 77011248
FINEST QUALITY PRODUCTS JAY BHARAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3510489Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 7, 2008
- Examiner
- GRAY, CAROLYN
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FINEST QUALITY PRODUCTS JAY BHARAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pico Rivera, CA
Pico Rivera, CA
Pico Rivera, CA
PICO RIVERA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher J. Day
Christopher J. Day Law Office of Christopher Day9977 North 90th Street, Suite 155Scottsdale, AZ 85258UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Processed grains, processed wheat, bakery desserts, bakery goods, bread, and prepared meals consisting primarily of pasta and rice, namely, methi khakhara (cracker), burfee (sweet candy), kalakan (sweet candy), halwa (sweet candy), ghari (sweet candy), penda (sweet candy), balushahi (sweet candy), bundi (sweet candy), churma (sweet candy), mohanthal (sweet candy), bhakarwadi (spicy stuffed pastry), bhel mix (trail mix), biscuits (cookies), chakri (chips), channa dal (trail mix), chevdo (trail mix), kachori (stuffed pastry), fafda (tea biscuit), fulwadi (spiced fried noodle snack), and gathiya (spiced fried noodle snack) | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Jay Bharat Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Jay Bharat Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Jay Bharat Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by JAY BHARAT FOODS, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named FINEST QUALITY PRODUCTS JAY BHARAT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2019 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 7, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2014 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 8, 2014 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2014 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| May 8, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | WDRL | OTQR WITHDRAWAL FROM PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 16, 2014 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 11, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 29, 2008 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 30, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 13, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 16, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 27, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |