Drawing for COMPUTIVE CORPORATION

USPTO serial 77011523

COMPUTIVE CORPORATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WOOD, CAROLINE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COMPUTIVE CORPORATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael E. Mangelson

MICHAEL E MANGELSON STOEL RIVES LLP201 S MAIN ST STE 1100SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-4904UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware, handheld computers, personal digital assistants (PDA), video game player machines for use with televisions and computers, and instruction manuals sold with each of the foregoing as a unitACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 20, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 20, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 27, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 25, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 25, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 10, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 10, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 23, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 13, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 13, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 2, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 2, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 19, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 19, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 19, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 27, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 27, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 16, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 5, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance