USPTO serial 77011596
EFOY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EFOY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Brunnthal-Nord, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Neal
SUSAN NEAL NEAL & MCDEVITT LLC1776 ASH STNORTHFIELD, IL 60093-3001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Methanol; chemical preparations for use in fuel cells | ACTIVE | May 12, 2006 |
| 009 | Electric apparatus and instruments; fuel cells, cartridges for fuel cells; solar batteries, starter batteries, automobile batteries, motorcycle batteries; electric solar cells; chargers for batteries and voltage transformers | ACTIVE | May 12, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2007 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |